Trump and the dilemma of putting the US or not in the Israel x Iran conflict
Remembering: Trump was elected promising peace and saying that he would act in the quick solution of conflict ongoing-Ukraine X Russia and Israel x Hamas.
Trump politically knows the division he faces. The Trumpist Movement known for the abbreviation Maga (Make America Great Again), active within the Republican Party, is cracked.
In this crack, there are those who still preach Bellicism – the nicknamed neon doctrine of intrusions, as happened in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya. On the opposite side, with voices of internal respect such as Steve Bannon and Tucker Carlson, are those who do not want war at all, keeping the position at the time of the elections.
Trump, in this nipple pool that has gotten, will have to position itself. He is aware of at least being able to maneuver egolatrral Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister who insinuates himself, modesty aside, the greatest strategist in the history of Israel and the Hebrew people.
Not quite, as Israel needs American support. Otherwise, it will not resist the war with Iran, without ignoring that it has open combat fronts in the Gaza geographical range and the Lebanon border – where Hezbollah continues, with bombs, endangering Israeli farmers.
To get an idea of dependence, and as international news agencies reported, the Israeli stock of Arrow model missiles, used to intercept the Iranian missiles, is already low. Only 5% of Iranian missiles can pierce Israel’s shield system, which employs the Arrow missiles. This means a need to maintain the protective shield.
