USA choose, for now, for silence in the face of the decision against Bolsonaro

Last month, the State Department issued a statement against Brazil in this regard, linking an alert in Brasilia that a retaliation could be built.

For jurists heard by Facto News In the US, the offensive is not supported by international law and represents improper interference with domestic affairs in another country. But it has been used with intensity by the new US government, breaking any logic of respect for a country’s sovereignty.

In just two months, Trump proliferated unilateral measures, whenever he chose to enforce the interest of the US, his government, or the far right.

Thus, the White House adopted at the end of last week sanctions against former Argentine president Cristina Kirchner. Justifying that the Israeli ally would be in trouble, Trump adopted retaliation against the Attorney General of the International Criminal Court, Karim Khan.

In South Africa, the Trump government has adopted measures against President Cyril Ramaphosa, due to its land distribution policy. There was also a threat against Panama, for their relations with China.

All of these measures exceeded US jurisprudence to act, as well as violate international law or merely diplomatic practice. Later this week, Trump announced that any country buying oil from Venezuela will have to pay an extra 25% tariff to the US government, an explicit violation of commercial agreements