Moraes revokes home and sends the elderly from 8/1 for violating precautions

Supreme Federal Court (STF) Minister Alexandre de Moraes revoked the household arrest of 72 -year -old Iraci Nagoshi, and 73 -year -old Vildete Guardia, for “repeatedly” the precautionary measures imposed on them, such as use of an anklet, prohibition of use of social networks and communication with others involved. The defenses were not found to speak up.

Moraes decreed the pre-trial detention of Iraci last Wednesday, 16, after being informed by the São Paulo State Electronic Monitoring Center-responsible for monitoring the use of the electronic anklet-which the elderly woman would have broken 966 times the rules of house arrest between April and June this year. She was sentenced to 14 years in prison.

Iraci was sentenced in December 2024 to start serving the sentence in closed regime, but in June this year Moraes granted house arrest. The elderly woman, however, would have come out several times from the an anklet inclusion area and stopped carrying the device to fulfill her “physiotherapy and therapeutic treatment routine”, as the defense defined.

Among the activities performed by Iraci are bodybuilding, pilates and water aerobics. The elderly woman had already been warned in October last year, before the beginning of the sentence, that all their travels should be previously authorized by the STF, which did not occur.

“I verified that the defendant has repeatedly breached, without any authorization of this Court, the imposed house arrest, plus the other precautionary measures, for recreational activities such as: bodybuilding, water aerobics and pilates,” Moraes said in the decision.

In the case of Vildete Guardia, the São Paulo Monitoring Center did not count the number of violations committed by the elderly. In a letter sent to Moraes, the agency cites Guardia would have breached the precautionary measures in ten days during July. The elderly woman was sentenced to 11 years in prison for involvement in the scammer acts of 8 January.

Thus with Iraci, Vildete was sentenced to start serving the sentence in a closed regime. The elderly woman served a sentence at the Santana Women’s Penitentiary (SP), but in April this year, Moraes ordered house arrest after the defense of the elderly stateing that she “suffers from serious health and locomotion problems.”

Moraes and the Attorney General’s Office (PGR) were in favor of house arrest of the elderly even with the penitentiary reported that, “from a clinical point of view and medical specialties, there is no objective and robust technical evidence that indicate the need for special care incompatible with the penitentiary system”.

But even with assured house arrest, Vildete has failed to comply with the precautionary. The defense of the elderly woman, however, only justified some of the violations. “The non -compliances were not properly justified, and there is no foundation for the non -compliances made,” wrote Moraes.

“The accused deliberately is disrespecting the measures imposed in these records, revealing his complete contempt for this supreme court and the judiciary,” the minister said when decreeing Villate’s arrest on July 7.

On July 15, Moraes requested the PGR demonstration after the defense of the elderly asking “the revocation of the arrest and granting house arrest, given imminent risk of death, according to a medical report attached to the case file, if the request is not appreciated with speed”. The PGR, in turn, requested the complementation of the documentation to prove that the elderly woman has comorbidities that would lead her to death if she was arrested.